Stable Miscalibration in Large Language Models: A Practical View of High-Confidence Errors

[Submitted on 15 Jul 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:High-confidence errors in large language models are often treated as evidence of fragile internal inference. We study a different possibility: stable miscalibration, where a confident wrong answer remains locally stable under small perturbations. We combine two diagnostics: a label-aware output-level audit score that ranks domains by confidence variation and overconfident mistakes under a forced-answer baseline, and an internal sensitivity probe that measures hidden-state movement. On a multi-domain binary factual audit set, this audit score tracks where abstention-aware self-critique reduces decision loss, although direct labeled baselines rank the same gain more strongly. Internally, self-critical prompting consistently reduces hidden-state sensitivity across layers in three open-weight models. This supports prompt-induced local stabilization rather than a purely output-level abstention pattern, but it does not imply calibration: audit-defined overconfident errors are not clearly more locally sensitive than confidently correct answers, so some high-confidence errors may be stable and miscalibrated rather than simply fragile.

Submission history

From: Akira Okutomi [view email]
[v1] Wed, 15 Jul 2026 06:27:17 UTC (1,204 KB)