Beyond Liars' Bench: The Impact of Lie Typology, Depth, and Sparsity on Deception Detection in LLMs

[Submitted on 29 May 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Training probes to detect deceptive outputs from large language models is still an open problem. Recent work has demonstrated that detection probes fail especially in out-of-domain scenarios — training on one type of lie does not transfer well to deception scenarios involving other types of lies. In this work, we conduct a systematic study on how various factors impact detection performance: representation depth, probe expressivity, sparse feature representations, and the lie typology of the training data. To this end, we augment standard benchmark training data with a supplementary dataset containing diverse types of deception, including fabrication, omission, and exaggeration examples. Analyzing these factors across seven probe types, our experimental results show that the optimal representation depth is highly dataset-dependent, more expressive probes provide only selective gains over linear baselines, and sparse autoencoder features perform similarly to dense hidden states. Ultimately, we demonstrate that the choice of training data and lie typology substantially changes detectability, highlighting that deception detection is a highly representation-dependent problem.

Submission history

From: Florian Mai [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 12:44:01 UTC (126 KB)