Critique of Agent Model

[Submitted on 22 Jun 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:What is an agent? What constitutes agency? With the rise of Large Language Model (LLM) systems marketed as “coding agents”, “AI co-scientists”, and other “agentic” tools that promise to drive up productivity, and at the same time, “existential” concerns such as AI escaping human control with destructive power under a speculative “machine agency” against humans, it has become essential to clarify where automation ends and agency begins, both for building capable systems and for understanding whether and what to fear. Drawing on Descartes’ grounding of agency in independent thought, and on portrayals of autonomous beings in science fiction, we survey the current landscape of AI agents, and analyze agent architectures along five dimensions: goal, identity, decision-making, self-regulation, and learning. Specifically, we argue that genuine agency requires these structures to be emph{internalized within the system itself} rather than assembled through external scaffolding. This distinction between emph{agentic} systems, whose competence resides in engineered workflows, and emph{agentive} systems, whose capabilities (including social interaction) arise endogenously, defines the boundary between systems designed for prescribed tasks, and those capable of operating in the open world with true autonomy. Building on this analysis, we propose the Goal-Identity-Configurator (GIC) architecture for a general-purpose agent model, combining hierarchical goal decomposition, identity evolution, simulative reasoning grounded in a separately trained world model, learned self-regulation, and self-directed learning from both real and simulated experience. Furthermore, we share insight on the auditability, controllability, and safety of agentive systems that possess greater autonomy and “agency”, but remain under human oversight.

Submission history

From: Mingkai Deng [view email]
[v1] Mon, 22 Jun 2026 22:50:02 UTC (1,068 KB)