Detecting a Route Flip Is Easier Than Knowing Whether to Fix It: Causal Route-Mediated Damage in Quantized Mixture-of-Experts

작성자

카테고리:

← 피드로
arXiv cs.AI · Parvel Gu · 2026-08-13 AI

[Submitted on 14 Jul 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Top-k Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) routing is discontinuous, so a deployment-motivated numerical disturbance — simulated 4-bit KV-cache quantization read by a protected BF16 gate — pushes tokens across decision boundaries and flips which experts fire. This paper proposes no new mitigation; it supplies a causal apparatus, empirical findings, and a detection-limit result. A four-run apparatus prices the route-mediated fraction (RMF) of quantization damage, a token-level attribution decomposes it by mechanism, and pre-registered probes carry the findings across three architectures. On OLMoE-1B-7B at 4-bit KV (pilot), about a third of the damage is routing-mediated: RMF ~ 0.31 (discovery 0.31 [0.20, 0.41]; process-replicated mean 0.313 +/- 0.020; pre-registered re-execution 0.231). The deployable router margin detects that a flip occurred (AUC 0.772) but cannot tell a harmful flip from a helpful one (at chance): among the tested local, inference-observable router statistics we find no predictor of a flip’s loss sign above chance — an empirical benefit-detection barrier bounding selective repair restricted to this feature family. The signed-flip tax and sign-inseparability carry cross-model; the clean-reference remedy’s payout is architecture-modulated; a controlled same-checkpoint flag-swap re-scopes the gate’s normalization convention to a damage-magnitude moderator, not a route-recoverability mechanism. A real int4 KV kernel yields a fraction compatible with the fake-quant dose curve but underpowered (95% CI [-0.111, 0.394] includes zero) — ruling out gross disagreement, not an independent replication. Hypotheses, thresholds, and evaluations were pre-registered before measurement, with misses reported; a pre-registered held-out read replicates the partition and the near-cancelling tax out of sample, while the strict impossibility exclusion narrowly misses.

Submission history

From: Parvel Gu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Jul 2026 01:12:04 UTC (373 KB)

원문에서 계속 ↗

추출 본문 · 출처: arxiv.org · https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11212

코멘트

답글 남기기