EngTrace: A Symbolic Benchmark for Verifiable Process Supervision of Engineering Reasoning

[Submitted on 3 Nov 2025 (v1), last revised 16 Jun 2026 (this version, v3)]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly entering specialized, safety-critical engineering workflows governed by strict quantitative standards and immutable physical laws, making rigorous evaluation of their reasoning capabilities imperative. However, existing benchmarks such as MMLU, MATH, and HumanEval assess isolated cognitive skills, failing to capture the physically grounded reasoning central to engineering, where scientific principles, quantitative modeling, and practical constraints must converge. To enable verifiable process supervision in engineering, we introduce EngTrace, a symbolic benchmark built on 90 parameterized templates, each generating unique, contamination-resistant problem instances, spanning three major engineering branches, nine core domains, and 20 distinct areas, yielding 1,350 test cases that stress-test generalization across diverse physical scenarios. Moving beyond outcome matching, we introduce a verifiable two-stage evaluation framework that uses a tiered protocol to validate intermediate reasoning traces alongside final answers through automated procedural checks and a heterogeneous AI Tribunal. Our evaluation of 27 leading LLMs reveals a distinct trade-off between numeric precision and trace fidelity, identifying a complexity cliff where abstract mathematical pre-training fails to translate into the integrative reasoning required for advanced engineering tasks.

Submission history

From: Ayesha Gull [view email]
[v1] Mon, 3 Nov 2025 15:05:44 UTC (5,583 KB)
[v2] Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:44:03 UTC (2,221 KB)
[v3] Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:04:30 UTC (2,319 KB)