From Context-Aware to Conflict-Aware: Generalizing Contrastive Decoding for Knowledge Conflict in LLMs

[Submitted on 9 Jun 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:When large language models generate from retrieved or augmented contexts, conflicts between external context and parametric priors remain a central reliability bottleneck. Existing contrastive decoding methods follow a emph{context-aware} paradigm that unilaterally amplifies context over parametric priors, overwriting correct priors when the context is erroneous. We generalize this to the textbf{conflict-aware} paradigm that dynamically allocates authority between prior and context based on conflict signals, rather than presupposing context trustworthiness. We show that the affine combination of prior and context logits yields a textbf{power family} with an inherent textbf{regime asymmetry}: extrapolation amplifies errors unboundedly when the prior is correct, interpolation under-corrects when the context is correct, and no static regime covers both. Existing contrastive decoding methods are instances of this family, mostly extrapolative. To evaluate both conflict directions, we propose TriState-Bench, a model-aware evaluation protocol that calibrates per-model prior knowledge to measure three conflict states: correction, resistance, and agreement. To resolve the asymmetry, we propose Adaptive Regime Routing (ARR), which routes between regimes at each step, lifting resistance EM from below 6 to 16–33 without sacrificing correction or agreement. Our code is available at this https URL.

Submission history

From: Keith Jiang [view email]
[v1] Tue, 9 Jun 2026 01:34:13 UTC (2,657 KB)