kept hitting the same wall doing SEO: every tool hands you a keyword list, but none hand you an actual content map you can plan a whole site around.
So I built TopicMap – paste one topic, get 60-90 article ideas grouped into 7-9 pillars, each tagged with search intent. A cluster you can hand straight to a writer. Free, no login.
The interesting part: no LLM
The first version used an LLM to generate the map. Two problems: it cost money per generation, and the difficulty scores were guesses – a real SEO would never trust them.
So I rebuilt it on real Google Autocomplete data instead:
- Recursively expands your topic through Google’s Suggest endpoint (2 levels deep) to harvest 100-800 real queries people actually type
- Clusters them into pillars by intent (how-to / commercial / transactional / questions)
- Filters out local-business + geo noise
- Tags each with intent + an estimated difficulty
No API key, no per-call cost, ~4s per map. Every keyword is a query people genuinely search – not invented.
Honest caveats
- Difficulty is estimated (from query specificity), not live SERP data. That’s the next thing if people find it useful.
- Narrow topics return thinner maps – because there’s genuinely less real search demand. It shows you what’s real, it doesn’t pad.
Try it
Free, no login: https://topicmap.app
Would love blunt feedback from SEO + content folks: is the output good enough to plan real content from, or does it read thin? What would make it worth paying for?
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode
답글 남기기
댓글을 달기 위해서는 로그인해야합니다.