The problem
AI agents like Claude Code and Codex write code fast. You run it, it works, you merge. A week later, there’s a bug — and you realize you never actually understood the code you shipped. You just transcribed it.
This is “vibe coding,” and it’s becoming the default way a lot of us write software now.
What I built
BuildIt is a set of hands-on courses where an AI agent proposes code changes like a normal diff — but you can’t move to the next step until you explain, in an actual conversation with an AI tutor, why the change was made and what could go wrong. You also write the prompt yourself before the AI generates anything.
No skipping. No checkbox you can fake. Real, compilable code from lesson one — not toy examples.
9 courses, 45 real shipped projects:
- Arduino
- STM32 (HAL)
- STM32 (LL)
- ESP32
- Next.js
- Python
- React
- React Native
- Flutter
How it works
- An AI agent proposes code (same diff screen you already know from Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity)
- BuildIt demands a line-by-line explanation before you can approve it
- An AI tutor verifies your understanding through real conversation
- Only then do you move to the next step
Technical details
- The tutor AI runs entirely locally in your browser — your code never leaves your machine
- Credits-based pricing — unlock a course, it’s yours even if you cancel later
- Built for teams too — share credits across an org, instill review habits from day one
Why this matters
AI will write more of our code over time, not less. That makes the ability to actually read and verify it more valuable, not less. BuildIt isn’t trying to teach you to write code from scratch — it’s trying to make sure you don’t lose control of the code an AI writes for you.
Would love feedback from anyone who’s felt that “I merged this AI diff and don’t actually understand it” moment.
답글 남기기