Learning-based Probabilistic Load Forecasting with Post-hoc and In-model Uncertainty

작성자

카테고리:

← 피드로
arXiv cs.AI · Sarah Al-Shareeda, Gulcihan Ozdemir, Heung Seok Jeon · 2026-07-15 AI

[Submitted on 14 Jul 2026]

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Smart-building load forecasters are often trained offline on dense, multivariate, high-frequency data, but deployment may provide only hourly, feature-limited inputs. Missing features must then be reconstructed, and their errors can propagate through the model. If this input uncertainty is not reflected, prediction intervals may become miscalibrated, affecting demand-response scheduling. Our work examines where uncertainty should be placed once inference inputs are reconstructed. We develop a unified one-day-ahead probabilistic forecasting framework that aligns temporal resolution, reconstructs the unavailable inputs, and derives causal features, and we compare a modular post-hoc residual-quantile scheme with an integrated in-model quantile-learning scheme. The comparison uses three mid-scale Deep Learning (DL) backbones: recurrent, hybrid recurrent, and attention-based Temporal Fusion Transformer (TFT) models, under identical inputs, forecasting horizon, preprocessing rules, and training budgets. Results show that uncertainty placement is backbone-dependent. Integrated quantile learning is most reliable with the TFT, yielding 2.2-3.6% MAPE and 28-83W RMSE on the labeled test window, while producing intervals about 5x narrower than the modular intervals at the closest-to-nominal coverage level. Diebold-Mariano tests support the TFT ranking and the mixed behavior of the recurrent backbones. A reconstruction-sensitivity test shows that reconstructed inputs increase the Quantile Score (QS) by 106% while interval width remains nearly unchanged, indicating that the model does not automatically absorb reconstruction-induced uncertainty. Robustness checks against non-DL baselines and seasonal hold-out weeks support this ranking. Our results expose the limits of post-hoc residual quantiles when inference depends on reconstructed inputs.

Submission history

From: Sarah Al-Shareeda Dr. [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Jul 2026 13:02:18 UTC (6,267 KB)

원문에서 계속 ↗

추출 본문 · 출처: arxiv.org · https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.12730

코멘트

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다