Library Reachability in LSR-Synth: How Anti-Memorization Design Changes the Measurement of Symbolic Discovery

작성자

카테고리:

← 피드로
arXiv cs.AI · Zhan'ao Yao, Liang Yin, Zhihao Gao, Boxuan Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Linjing Li, Rongyan Wang, Tingwei Chen, Youwei Wang, Xiaolin Zhao, Jiahui Shi, Jianjun Liu · 2026-08-03 AI

[Submitted on 30 Jul 2026]

Authors:Zhan’ao Yao, Liang Yin, Zhihao Gao, Boxuan Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Linjing Li, Rongyan Wang, Tingwei Chen, Youwei Wang, Xiaolin Zhao, Jiahui Shi, Jianjun Liu

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Existing benchmarks for scientific equation discovery are largely composed of well-known equations available in the public domain, making it difficult to determine whether a model is discovering laws from data or merely recalling answers from its training corpus. LSR-Synth mitigates this problem by introducing novel synthetic terms into established scientific mechanisms and filtering the resulting tasks for novelty, solvability, and scientific plausibility. This paper examines a narrower measurement question: can these tasks further distinguish scientific priors supplied by language models from conventional operator search that does not access task semantics? We construct a semantics-free baseline using a fixed vocabulary with publicly documented provenance, and assess the role of candidate coverage through semantic blinding, library weakening, and matched operator-family knockouts. Under the current task snapshot, search budget, and scoring protocol, the fixed vocabulary already covers most tasks, while language-model-generated candidates rarely expand the set of solvable instances. Their marginal contribution becomes substantial only when vocabulary coverage is selectively disrupted. Strict out-of-distribution evaluation lowers the absolute success rates of all methods but does not alter this relationship. These findings neither invalidate LSR-Synth’s controls against memorization of complete formulas nor imply that language-model priors are generally unhelpful. Rather, they support a more limited conclusion: most current tasks remain suitable for evaluating the fitting and recombination of previously unseen expressions, but are insufficient on their own to identify contributions from priors beyond a fixed search space.

Submission history

From: Zhan’ao Yao [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Jul 2026 02:36:26 UTC (561 KB)

원문에서 계속 ↗

추출 본문 · 출처: arxiv.org · https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28684

코멘트

답글 남기기

이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 필드는 *로 표시됩니다